Storytelling in History Education

Storytelling can be an engaging component of history education and historical thinking. Telling a compelling story and using film or digital projects allows learners to interact with history differently reading based learning. Making history entertaining does not diminish it but can offer an opportunity to approach a subject differently. In a learning environment, film and digital storytelling can be the launching point for working on historical thinking and analysis.

When I taught leadership to ensigns a lifetime ago, we usually ended the course with a movie about leadership and crisis, from The Caine Mutiny to 12 O’clock High. These work well to lead into a capstone type discussion for while they entertained – Bogart and strawberries is funny on the surface – they opened further discussion points on crisis leadership, relationships, and followership. A tool for learning history and historical thinking, films can do the same thing. I reviewed Hacksaw Ridge for an assignment, and it would be an intriguing one for a class. Were I teaching it, I would tee up assignments relating to conscientious observers, reading first-hand accounts of the Pacific campaign, discussion of attitudes toward the Japanese, and the toll of the war on the home front. Another potential topic is what is left out. The movies tight focus on Private Doss and his company did not afford a look at another part of the tragedy at Okinawa, the mass suicide of civilians afraid of what the American troops may do to them.

Part of the assignment would be learning about Bedford, Virginia, home to a memorial to the “Bedford Boys” who died on D-Day and the National D-Day Memorial. Bedford is a typical small town, but in June of 1944 suffered the highest per capita loss on the beaches of Normandy.  

https://www.bbtcva.org/about

Film and digital history projects can bring a different perspective and, hopefully, develop empathy. It is a very human reaction to identify with the characters in a story, so that can be channeled into a wider view of the world being portrayed as well as the challenges faced by the people living in it.  Creating digital history projects also allow students to engage with material differently, thinking about not only the sourced information, but thinking about the audio and visual representation of the subject.

Dismissing film and digital projects as space fillers in a learning environment misses out on an opportunity to take history off the pages and encourage interest in further learning.

The History of Teaching History and the Second Piece of the Puzzle

The Washington Post ran an article in September of 2023 about a teacher in South Carolina who was worried. Her decision the previous year to teach Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehisi Coates had landed her in trouble with parents and school officials, even though she had alternate assignments for students who felt uncomfortable reading the book. She planned to teach it again, conceding that it was unnerving to not know whether her students would turn on her or turn her in again.1 While she was teaching AP Language, not history, it does frame one of the challenges of teaching historical thinking. Political and social divisions are creating tension between what and how history is taught at all levels of education.

The history taught in schools, as Linder explains, can be considered as the somewhat official story of the country. The facts and how they are presented make up how the nation tells a coherent story of its past, present and future. In spite of the external pressures, the wide availability of digital resources offers the opportunity for teachers to encourage historical thinking and teaching critical thinking about history. Primary source material and additional resources are more readily available for students to review, understand, evaluate and synthesize. Empathy may be further developed as looking at the people in history and their circumstances, especially through digital projects such as Slave Voyages, which not only provide sources and context, but helps humanize the data. 

Changes in technology have changed not only how educators can teach history, but how they are able to evaluate understanding through methods beside the traditional paper. Digital projects as student products also help develop historical thinking skills. Including digital projects as both sources and products also offer another way to engage students. Events such as Virginia History Day  — Science Fair for History — allow students from elementary age to high school to develop websites, videos and podcast productions to explore subjects that interest them while learning digital skills. The platform for demonstrating understanding may be different, but the basic skills remain the same. 

The Second Piece of the Puzzle

The “Adventures West” project includes both a game and accompanying Omeka site targeted at late middle school and early high school students. The idea is as they work through the game, players evaluate primary and secondary source material about the Laura Ingalls Wilder novels about her family. Links to sources and media drive the storyline forward and require understanding and evaluation of her writings. The Omeka site will include additional resources on the thornier issues raised by Wilder’s writing and the criticism of her writings in recents years.

Learning to think in terms of Historical Thinking

In all the readings we have been doing on historical thinking and thinking about teaching history, a core element was the tension between the why and the what of history. Wineburg described thinking about history almost as a dartboard, with what as the bullseye and why and how as the next rings. Structurally, these build a narrative about thinking about history, not in terms of the memorization, but the reading and analysis core of historical thinking.  

The elements of historical thinking that show up across the readings in similar ideas if not exact language are: 

                  Accounting for multiple perspectives and narratives,

                  Primary sources used and analyzed

                  Sourcing and the perspective of the primary source

                  Understanding historical context

                  Progress and decline

                  Making the connection between evidence and the claim being made.

                  Humanizing history

The heart of this is primary sourcing – learning and understanding how to read primary sources, both in the literal way and intellectually. Placing primary sources in the context of their time and developing an understanding of the why and what of the source. Every account is colored by the author’s intent and point of view and should be viewed in the context of their time.  Starting with primary sources and thinking about history as a human narrative allows practitioners to frame compelling narratives.

Some fundamental questions in the teaching if history relate to how to incorporate historical thinking in the classroom. First, how does teaching move from the memorization model to a historical thinking model, allowing students to learn the procedural part of history, the reading, writing and analysis of history.  Setting up ways for them to explore history and determining the gaps their basic knowledge and how to develop them. 

Levesque noted that history is often presented to students in a prepackaged (“crafted”) form, leaving the question of how can the “crafted” history be used to teach.  Think it can be used as a starting point, or to provide a narrative to be studied and challenged.

The final question is, if history is made of multiple narratives, how that can be combined to create depth of historical knowledge and historical thinking.  Another of Levesque idea was teachers as coaches in their students’ learning, an easy idea to propose but challenging in practice. To coach students in historical thinking, educators have to think through asking the right questions, again, to identify skill gaps and to engage students in the learning the process of history.